Abdullah,  M.  S.,  Rahman,  S.,  &  Kinabalu,  K.  (2014).  Gaya  pembelajaran  dan kesedaran  

metakognitif  dalam  kalangan  pelajar  aliran  sains.  Proceeding  of  the Sosial   Sciences   

Research   ICSSR   2014,   12(123),   712–719.   Retrieved   from http://worldconferences.net

 

Abu  Hassan,  K.  (2003).  Kurikulum  Sains  Sekolah  Malaysia,  Modul  Pengajaran.

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Adam,  B,  Mitcham.,  C.  (2012).  Ethics  and  Science:  An  Introduction.  Cambridge University 

Press, New York.

 

Albe, V. (2008a). Students‘ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a 

controversial socioscientific issue. Science and Education, 17(8–9), 805–827. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9086-6

 

Albe, V. (2008b). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social 

considerations intersect: Students‘ argumentation in group discussions on   a   socio-scientific   

Issue.   Research   in   Science   Education,   38(1),   67–90. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2

 

Alshare,  K.  A.  (2008).  Predicting  Students  Usage  of  Internet  in  Two  Emerging Economies 

Using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Academy of Educational Leardership Journal, 

12(2), 109–129.

 

Amaratunga,  D.,  Baldry,  D.,  Sarshar,  M.,  &  Newton,  R.  (2007).  Quantitative  and 

qualitative research in the built environment?: application of `` mixed   research approach   

Dilanthi   Amaratunga.   Work   Study,   51(1).   https://doi.org/10.1108/ 00438020210415488

 

Anderson,  L.W.,  Krathwohl,  D.R.,  Airasian,  P.W.,  Cruikshank,  K.A.,  Mayer,  R.E., Pintrich, 

P.R., Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing:  A  revision  of  

Bloom’s  Taxonomy  of  Educational  Objectives.  New York, Longman.

 

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice?: A  Review  and 

 Recommended  Two-Step  Approach.  Psychological  Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

 

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., P.W., C., K.A., M., R.E., P., P.R., & Raths, J., & Wittrock,  M. 

 C.  (2001).  A  taxonomy  for  learning,  teaching,  and  assessing:  A revision of Bloom’s 

Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

 

Arbuckle,   J.   L.   (2005).   AMOS   6.0   user’s   guide.   Spring   House,   PA:   Amos pment 

Corporation.

 

Assessment,  I.  S.,  Cooperation,  E.,  Council,  A.,  Math,  I.,  &  Study,  S.  Scientific 

Literacy    and    Contexts    in    PISA    2006    Science    (2009).    https://doi.org/ 

10.1002/tea.20332

 

Babin,  B.  J.,  Hair,  J.  F.,  &  Boles,  J.  S.  (2008).  Publishing  research  in  marketing 

journals  using  structural  equation  modeling.  Journal  of  Marketing  Theory  and Practice, 

16(4), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679160401

 

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On  The Evaluation of Structural Equation Model.

Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

 

Baharom  Mohamad,  Ali  Suradin,  &  Za‘aBa  Helmi  Khamisan.  (2008).  Peranan Pendidikan   Islam  

 dan   Pendidikan   Moral   dalam   Membina   Sahsiah   Pelajar Berkualiti. In Dalam Persidangan 

Pembangunan Pelajar Peringkat Kebangsaan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (pp. 22–23).

 

Balakrishnan,  V.,  Liew,  T.  K.,  & Pourgholaminejad,  S.  (2014).  Fun  Learning With Edooware   

 -    A    Social    Media    Enable    Tool.    Computers    &   Education. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.008

 

Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., … Wu, N. (2009). Learning and Scientific 

Reasoning. Science, 323, 586–587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science

.1167740

 

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in  Social  

Psychological   Research?:  Conceptual   ,  Strategic  ,  and  Statistical Considerations. Journal 

of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.51(6), 1173– 1182.

 

Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1999). Creating Contexts for Learning and Self-authorship: 

Constructive-Developmental Pedagogy. Vanderbilt University Press Nashville.

 

Beemt,  A.  Van  Den,  &  Diepstraten,  I.  (2016).  Computers  &  Education  Teacher perspectives  

on  ICT?:  A  learning  ecology  approach.  Computers  &  Education, 92–93, 161–170. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.017

 

Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). Understandings of the Nature of Science and Decision Making 

on Science and Technology Based Issues. Wiley Interscience, 352–377. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10063

 

Bencze,  L.,  Sperling,  E.,  & Carter,  L.  (2012).  Students  ‘  Research-Informed  Socio- 

scientific   Activism?:   Re   /   Visions   for   a   Sustainable   Future,   129–148. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9260-3

 

Bentler,  P.  M.  (1990).  Comparative  fit  indices  in  structural  model.  Psychological 

Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

 

Bhat,  M.  A.  (2016).  The  Predictive  Power  of  Reasoning  Ability  on  Academic Achievement.  

International  Journal  of  Learning,  Teaching  and  Educational

Research, 15(1), 79–88.

 

Bhutta, Z. A. (2002). Ethics in international health research?: a perspective from the developing 

world *. Buletin of the World Health Organization, 80(1).

 

Bialek, W., & Botstein, D. (2004). Introductory Science and Mathematics Education for 21st-Century 

Biologists, 303(February), 788–790.

 

Blissett, S., Cavalcanti, R. B., & Sibbald, M. (2012). reflection Should we teach using schemas??  

Evidence  from  a  randomised  trial.  In  Medical  Education  (pp.  815– 822).    Blackwell    

Publishing    Ltd.    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012. 04311.x

 

Blunch,  N.  (2013).  Introduction  to  Structural  Equation  Modeling  Using  IBM  SPSS Statistics 

and Amos. SAGE Publication Ltd.

 

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equation with latent variables. New York: Wiley. Bonk,  C.  J.  

(2009).  The  World  is  Open:  How  Web  Technology  Is  Revolutionizing

Education. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94104; Tel: 415-433-1767,.

 

Breiner,  J.  M., Johnson,  C.  C.,  Harkness,  S.  S., &  Koehler,  C.  M.  (2012).  What  Is 

STEM??   A   Discussion   About   Conceptions   of   STEM   in   Education   and Partnerships. 

School Science & Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11.

 

Brien, C. O., Hartshorne, R., Beattie, J., & Jordan, L. (2012). RSCO A Comparison of Large  Lecture 

 ,  Fully  Online  ,  and  Hybrid  Sections  of  Introduction  to  Special Education. Rural Special 

Education Quaterly, 30(4), 19–31.

 

Briggle, A., & Mitcham, C. (2012). Ethics and Science. Cambridge University Press, New York.

 

Brophy, J., & Brophy, J. (2010). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education?: 

Developing appreciation for .. Toward a Model of the Value Aspects of  Motivation  in  Education?:  

Developing  Appreciation  for  Particular  Learning Domains and Activities, (February 2013), 37–41.

 

Byrne  Barbara M.  (2010).  Structural  Equation Modeling  with  AMOS  (Second  Edi).

Routledge New York London.

 

Cano,  F.  (2005).  Epistemological  beliefs  and  approaches  to  learning?:  Their  change 

through  secondary  school  and  their  influence  on  academic  performance,  203– 221. 

https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X22683

 

Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College Students Decision-Making Tendencies in the Context  of  

Socioscientific  Issues  (  SSI  ).  J  Korea  Assoc.  Science  Education,

), 887–900.\

 

Christenson,   N.,   &   Rundgren,   S.-N.   C.   (2014).   A   Framework   for   Teachers   ‘ 

Assessment  of  Socio-scientific  Argumentation?:  An  example  using  the  GMO issue.  Journal  of 

 Biological  Education,  9266(October),  1–10.  https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00219266.2014.923486

 

Chua Yan Piaw. (2014). Ujian Regresi, Analisis Faktor Dan Analisis SEM. Mc Graw Hill Education.

 

Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted Kappa: Nominal Scales Agreement With Provision For Scaled Disagreement 

Or Partial Credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213–220. 

https://doi.org/http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0026256

 

Cohen,  J.  (1992).  Quantitative  Methods  in  Psychology.   Psychological  Bulletin, 112(1), 

155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

 

Comstock, G. (2001). Ethics and genetically modified foods. Food Ethics, 183–202.

 

Conley,  A.  M.,  Pintrich,  P.  R.,  Vekiri,  I.,  &  Harrison,  D.  (2004).  Changes  in 

epistemological    beliefs    in    elementary    science    students.    Contemporary Educational  

 Psychology,   29(2),   186–204.   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.

2004.01.004

 

Cooper,  D.  R.,  &  Schindler,  P.  S.  (2003).  Business  Research  Methods  (8th  editio).

New York: McGraw Hill.

 

Creswell,  J.  W.  (2013).  Research  Design?:  Quatitative,  Qualitative,  and  Mixed Methods 

Approaches. SAGE Publication, Inc.

 

Cronbach,  L.  J.  (1946).  Educational  and  Psychological  Measurement.  Educational and  

Psychological  Measurement,  6(475).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164446 00600405

 

Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in Bloom?: Implementing Bloom  ‘  s  

Taxonomy  to  Enhance  Student  Learning  in  Biology.  Life  Sciences Education, 7, 368–381. 

https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08

 

Cunningham,  E.  (2008).  A  Practical  Guide  to  Structural  Equation  Modelling  using AMOS. 

Melbourne: Statsline.

 

Daempfle, P. (2002). Instructional Approaches for the Improvement of Reasoning in Introductory 

College Biology Courses: A Review of the Research.

 

Daempfle,  P.  (2012).  Science  &  Society:  Scientific  Thought  and  Education  for  the 21st 

Century. Retrieved March 7, 2016, from http://www.amazon.com/Science- 

Society-Scientific-Thought-Education/dp/1449685021/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8

 

De  Wulf,  K.  G.,  Odekerden-Schroder,  &  Lacobucci,  D.  (2001).  Invesments  in consumer 

relationship: A cross-country and cross-industry exploration. Journal

keting, 65(4), 33–50.

 

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research.

SAGE Publication Ltd.

 

Driver,   R.,   &   Oldham,   V.   (2008).   A   Constructivist   Approach   to   Curriculum 

Development  in  Science.  Studies  in  Science  Education,  (December  2014),  37– 41. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268608559933

 

Duggan,  S.,  &  Gott,  R. (2002).  What  sort  of  science  education  do  we  really need? 

International  Journal  of  Science  Education,  24(7),  661–679.  https://doi.org/ 

10.1080/09500690110110133

 

Dunbar, K. N., & Klahr, D. (2012). Scientific Thinking and Reasoning. In The Oxford Handbook  of  

Thinking  and  Reasoning  (pp.  699–718).  https://doi.org/10.1093

/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0035

 

Dwyer, C., Hogan, M., & Stewart, I. (2011). The promotion of critical thinking skills through 

argument mapping.

 

Ekborg, M., Ottander, C., Silfver, E., & Simon, S. (2013). Teachers‘ Experience of Working  with  

Socio-scientific  Issues:  A  Large  Scale  and  in  Depth  Study. Research in Science Education, 

43(2), 599–617.

 

Elder, A. . (1999). An Exploration of Fifth Grade Students’ Epistemological Beliefs in Science and 

an Investigation of Their Relation to Science Learning. University of Michigan, Michigan.

 

Ellison,  N.  B.  (2007).  The  Benefits  of  Facebook  ?? Friends?:‘?  Social  Capital  and 

College   Students   ‘   Use   of   Online   Social   Network   Sites,   12,   1143–1168. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x

 

Elm,  D.  R.,  &  Weber,  J.  (1994).  Measuring  moral  judgment:  The  Moral  Judgment Interview 

or the Defining Issues Test?  Journal of Business Ethics, 13(5), 341– 355. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00871762

 

Fatin,  A.,  Salleh,  A.?;  M.,  Bilal,  A.  M.,  &  Salmiza,  S.  (2012).  Faktor  penyumbang 

kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran sains: satu analisis sorotan tesis. Medc2012, 

17. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n3.2

 

Fleis,  J.  L.  (1971).  MEASURING  NOMINAL  SCALE  AGREEMENT  AMONG

MANY  RATERS  1.  Psychological  Bulletin,  76(5),  378–382.  https://doi.org

/http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0031619

 

Fleming,  R.  (1986).  Adolescent  Reasoning  in  Socio-Scientific  Issues,  Part  I:  Social 

Cognition.  Journal  of  Research  in  Science  Teaching,  23(8),  677–87.  https:// 

doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660230803

 

Floyd,  F.  J.,  &  Widaman,  K.  F.  (1995).  Factor  Analysis  in  the  Develepment  & Refinement 

 of  Clinical  Assessment  Instrument.pdf.  Psychology  Assessment,

, 286–299.

 

Floyd J Fowler, J. (2014). Survey Research Methods. SAGE Publication, Inc.

 

Foong, C.-C., & Daniel, E. G. S. (2012). Students‘ Argumentation Skills across Two Socio-Scientific 

  Issues   in   a   Confucian   Classroom:   Is   transfer   possible? International  Journal  of  

Science  Education,  (January  2015),  1–25.   https:// doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.697209

 

Fornell,  C.,  &  Larcker,  D.  F.  (1981).  Evaluating  Str  Erroructural  Equation  Models with 

unobservable variables and Measurements. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

 

Fowler, S. R. (2009). College students   use of science content during socioscientific issues   

negotiation?:   Impact   of   evolution   understanding   and   acceptance. University of South 

Florida.

 

Fowler,  S.  R.,  &  Zeidler,  D.  L.  (2016).  Lack  of  Evolution  Acceptance  Inhibits Students 

‘ Negotiation of Biology-based Socioscientific Issues Lack of Evolution Acceptance  Inhibits  

Students  ‘  Negotiation  of  Biology-based  Socioscienti  fi  c Issues, 9266(March). 

https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1150869

 

Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral Sensitivity in the Context of 

Socioscientific Issues in High School Science Students. International Journal of    Science    

Education,    31(2),    279–296.    https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069

0701787909

 

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to Design Research in Education (3rd editio). New 

York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

 

Frankfort-Nach.   (1992).   Foundation   of   Behavioural   Research.   New   York;   St.

Martin‘s Press.

 

Franko, D. L., Cousineau, T. M., Trant, M., Craig, T., Rancourt, D., Thompson, D., Ciccazzo, M. 

(2008). Motivation , self-ef fi cacy , physical activity and nutrition in college students?: 

Randomized controlled trial of an internet-based education program, 47, 369–377. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.06.013

 

Frazer, L., & Lawley, M. (2000). Questionnaire Design and Administration. Brisbane, Australia: John 

Wiley & Sons.

 

Furberg, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2008). Students‘ Meaning?  making of Socio?  scientific Issues  in  

Computer  Mediated  Settings:  Exploring  learning  through  interaction trajectories. 

International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09500690701543617

 

Gallagher, M. W., & Brown, T. A. (2013). 14 . Introduction To Confirmatory Factor Analysis and 

Structural, (1), 289–314.

 

Garson,  G.  D.  (2012).  Structural  Equation  Mideling.  Asheboro,  NC:  Statistical

sociates.

 

Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M. ., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning  

environments,  teaching  procedures  and  scientific  reasoning  ability. International     Journal 

    of     Science     Education.     https://doi.org/10.1080/ 095006901750162892

Goodfellow,  M.,  &  Wade,  B.  (2007).  The  Digital  Divide  And  First-Year  Students.

J.College Student Retention, 8(4), 425–438.

 

Graham, J. W., Hofer, S. M., Donaldson, D. P., Mackkinnon, & Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis with 

missing data in prevention research. In K. Bryant, M. Windle, &

P.  West  (Eds.),  The  Science  of  prevention:  Methodological  advances  from alcohol   and   

substance   abuse   research   (pp.   325–366).   Washinton   ,   DC: American Psychological 

Association.

 

Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2000). Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences (5th ed.). 

Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

 

Gregory  S.  Blimling.  (2016).  Creating  Contexts  for  Learning  and  Self-Authorship: 

Constructive   Developmental   Pedagogy   (review).   The   Journal   of   Higher Education, 

73(May), 307–309. https://doi.org/10.1352/jhe.2002.0015

 

Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., Baumgartner, H., & Cote, J. A. (2004). Multicollinearity and Measurement  

Error  in  Structural  Equation  Models?:  Implications  for  Theory. Marketing    Science,    23,  

  No.4(November    2014).    https://doi.org/10.1287/ mksc.1040.0070

 

Griffiths, D. (2016).  Informal  Learning Recognition and Management.  Computer in Human Behaviour, 

55A(February), 501–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015. 10.019

 

Hair,  Joseph  F.  William  C.  Black.  Barry  J.  Babin,  .  Rolph  E.  Anderson.  (2011).

Multivariate Analysis (seventh ed). New Jersey, Prentice Hall.

 

Hall, J., & Sammons, P. (2013). Mediation, Moderation & Interaction. In T. T. (Ed) (Ed.),  Handbook 

 of  Quantitative  Methods  for  Educational  Research  (pp.  267– 286). 2013 Sense Publishers.

 

Hansson,   L.,   Redfors,   A.,   &   Rosberg,   M.   (2011).   Students‘   Socio-Scientific 

Reasoning in an Astrobiological Context During Work with a Digital Learning Environment.  Journal  

of  Science  Education  and  Technology,  20,  388–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9260-5

 

Hasnah  Ali,  Luqman  Ahmad,  Sanep  Ahmad,  &  Noraziah  Ali.  (2009).  Keperluan, Kepentingan  

dan  Sumbangan  Perancangan  Pendidikan  Dalam  Pembangunan Ekonomi Malaysia. Jurnal of Social 

Sciences and Humanities, 4(1), 13–29.

 

Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New   

Millennium.   Communication   Monographs,   Vol.76(July   2013),   37–41.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360

 

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process

Analysis. GP The Guilford Press.

 

Hmelo-silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A., Hmelo-silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., &  Chinn,  C. 

 A.  (2007).  Scaffolding  and  Achievement  in  Problem-Based  and Inquiry  Learning?:  A  

Response  to  Kirschner  ,  Sweller  ,  and  Scaffolding  and Achievement in Problem-Based and 

Inquiry Learning?: A Response to Kirschner

, Sweller , and Clark ( 2006 ), (October 2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0 0461520701263368

 

Hodson,  D.  (2014).  Learning  Science,  Learning  about  Science,  Doing  Science: Different  

goals  demand  different  learning  methods.  International  Journal  of Science Education, 36(15). 

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722

 

Hofer,   B.   K.   (2000).   Dimensionality  and   Disciplinary   Differences   in   Personal 

Epistemology.  Contemporry  Educational  Psychology,  405,  378–405.  https:// 

doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1026

 

Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About 

Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning. Review of   Educational   Research,   

67(spring   1997),   88–140.   https://doi.org/10.3102/ 00346543067001088

 

Hogan,  K.  (2002).  Small  Groups  â€TM  Ecological  Reasoning  While  Making  an Environmental 

Management Decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341–368. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10025

 

Hogan,  M.  J.,  Dwyer,  C.  P.,  Harney,  O.  M.,  Noone,  C.,  &  Conway,  R.  J.  (2015). 

Metacognitive Skill Development and Applied Systems Science?: A Framework of Metacognitive Skills , 

Self-regulatory Functions and Real-World Applications (pp.    75–106).    ©    Springer    

International    Publishing    Switzerland    2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2

 

Hopwood, C. J., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). How Should The Internal Structure of Personality   

Inventories   be   Evaluated?   Personality   and   Social   Psychology Review, 14(3), 332–346.

 

Howitt,  D.,  &  Cramer,  D.  (2003).  An  Introduction  to  Statistics  in  Psychology:  A 

Complete Guide for Students (Second edi). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.

 

Hussey.,  J.,  &  Hussey.,  R.  (1997).  Business  Research:  A  Practical  Guide  for 

Undergraduate and Postgradute Students. London:Macmillan Press.

 

IEA. (2012). TIMSS 2011 INTERNATIONAL RESULTS IN SCIENCE. New directions

ment (Vol. 2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20038

 

Ikhwan,  M.  S.  M.,  Sadiah,  B.,  &  Eshah,  M.  S.  (2017).  Scientific  reasoning  skills based 

on socio-scientific issues in the biology subject. International Journal of Advanced             

and             Applied             Sciences,             4(3),             13–18. 

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2017.03.003

 

Itin, C. M. (1999). Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change 

... The Journal of Experiental Education, Fall 1999(22,2), 91.

 

James, M. C., Willoughby, S., James, M. C., & Willoughby, S. (2013). Listening to student 

conversations during clicker questions?: What you have not heard might surprise you?! Listening to 

student conversations during clicker questions?: What you  have  not  heard  might  surprise  

you?!,  123(2011).  https://doi.org/10.1119/ 1.3488097

 

Kalarova, T., Hadjiali, I., Denev, I. (2013). High School Students â€TM Reasoning in Making 

Decisions  about Socio-Ethical  Issues of  Genetic Engineering?: Case of Gene Therapy EDUCATION & 

BASIC SCIENCE. Education & Basic Science, (October 2014), 37–41. 

https://doi.org/10.5504/BBEQ.2012.0133

 

Kampa, N., Neumann, I., Heitmann, P., & Kremer, K. (2016). Epistemological beliefs in  science  —  

a  person-centered  approach  to  investigate  high  school  students  ‘ profiles.   Contemporary   

Educational   Psychology,   46,   81–93.   https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.04.007

 

Kamtekar, R. (2012). Situationism and Virtue Ethics on the Content of Our Character

*. Chicago Journals, 114(3), 458–491. https://doi.org/10.1086/381696

 

Karoline, E., & Justin, H. (2012). Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science  and  

Technology  Education.  Springer  Dordrecht  Heidelberg  New  York London. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7793-4

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Ringkasan Eksekutif Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan    

Malaysia    2013-2025    (Pendidikan    Prasekolah    hingga    Lepas Menengah).      Retrieved     

 from      http://www.moe.gov.my/cms/upload_files/ articlefile/2013/articlefile_file_003113.pdf

 

Kenny,  D.  A.,  &  McCoach,  B.  (2009).  Effect  of  the  Number  of  Variables  on Measures of 

Fit in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Model: A Multidisciplinary   Journal,   

10(3)(February   2015),   333–351.   https://doi.org/ 10.1207/S15328007SEM1003

 

Kent, R. (2001). Data Contruction and Data Analysis for Survey research. Palgrave, New York.

 

Kerl nger, F. N. (2004). Foundation of The Behavioral Research (2nd editio). Sarjeet ication. 

Delhi.

 

King,   Patricia   M.;   Kitchener,   K.   S.   (1994).   Developing   reflective   judgment: 

Understanding   and   promoting   intellectual   growth   and   critical   thinking   in 

adolescents and adults. ossey-Bass, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco.

 

King,  P.  M.  (1981).  Reflective  Judgment?:  Concepts  of  Justification  and  Their 

Relationship to Age and Education, 16.

 

Kline,  R.  B.  (2011).  Principles  and  Practice  of  Structural  Equation  Modeling.  The 

Guilford Press New York London.

 

Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2011). Science Teachers‘ Use of Mass Media to 

Address Socio-Scientific and Sustainability Issues. Research in Science Education, 42, 51–74. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9256-z

 

Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2012). Science Teachers‘ Use of Mass Media to 

Address Socio-Scientific and Sustainability Issues. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 51–74. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9256-z

 

Klosterman, M. L., Sadler, T. D., & Brown, J. (2012). Science Teachers‘ Use of Mass Media to 

Address Socio-Scientific and Sustainability Issues. Research in Science Education, 42, 51–74. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9256-z

 

KPM. (2002). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Biologi Tingkatan 4.

 

KPM.   (2012).   Dasar   Pendidikan   Kebangsaan.   Perpustakaan   Negara   Malaysia.

Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/BUKU DASAR.pdf

 

Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The Development of Argument Skills,  74(5), 1245– 1260.

 

Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. (2012). Laporan Awal   Pelan   

Pembangunan   Pendidikan   Malaysia   2013-2025.   Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

 

Lederman, N. G., Abd-el-khalick, F., Bell, R. L., Hall, R., & Street, E. (2002). Views of Nature of 

Science Questionnaire?: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners ‘ Conceptions of Nature 

of Science, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/tea.10034

 

Lee,   H.,   &   Witz,   K.   G.   (2009).   Science   Teachers‘   Inspiration   for   Teaching 

Socio?  scientific   Issues:   Disconnection   with   reform   efforts.   International Journal of 

Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801898903

 

Lee,  Y.  C.  (2012).  Socio-Scientific  Issues  in  Health  Contexts:  Treading  a  rugged 

terrain.  International  Journal  of  Science  Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/ 

09500693.2011.613417

 

Leighton,  J.  P.  (2006).  Teaching  and  Assessing  Deductive  Reasoning  Skills.  The Journal  

of  Experimental  Education,  74(2),  107–136.  https://doi.org/10.3200/

JEXE.74.2.107-136

 

Leighton, J. P., Gokiert, R. J., & Cui, Y. (2007). Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Methods   to  

 Identify   the   Cognitive   Dimensions   In   a   Large-Scale   Science Assessment.  

International  Journal  of  Testing,  7(2),  141–189.  https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15305050701193520

 

Levinson, R., & Levinson, R. (2007). Towards a Theoretical Framework for Teaching Controversial  

Socio  scientific  Issues  Towards  a  Theoretical  Framework  for Teaching      Controversial      

Socio-scientific,      (September      2013),      37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753

 

Levison,  R.  (2006).  Towards  a  Theoretical  Framework  for  Teaching  Controversial 

Socio-scientific  Issues.  International  Journal  of  Science  Education,  28,  1201– 1224. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753

 

Lewis,  A.,  Smith,  D.,  &  Lewis,  A.  (2009).  Defining  higher  order  thinking,  (March 2015), 

37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543588

 

Lewis,  J.,  &  Leach,  J.  (2006).  Discussion  of  Socio?  scientific  Issues:  The  role  of 

science knowledge.  International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/ 

10.1080/09500690500439348

 

Liou,  P.,  &  Hung,  Y.  (2014).  Statistical  techniques  utilized  in  analyzing  pisa  and 

timss  data  in  science  education  from  1996  to  2013:  a  methodological  review, (May). 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9558-5

 

Lodewyk,   K.   (2007).   Educational   Psychology?:   An   International   Journal   of 

Experimental Relations among Epistemological Beliefs , Academic Achievement

, and Task Performance in Secondary School Students. Educational Psychology, 27(November 2014), 

37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601104080

 

Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural 

Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

 

Lori  D.  Patton,  Kristen  A.  Renn,  Florence  M.  Guido,  S.  J.  Q.  (2016).  Student 

Development   in   College:   Theory,   Research,    and   Practice.   Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 

Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94104; Tel: 415-433-1767,.

 

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantificatiom of Content Validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 

382–385.

 

Macer,  D.  R.  J.  (2006).  A  Cross-Cultural  Introduction  to  Bioethics.  No  Title.

Christchurch, N.Z.: Eubios Ethics Institute.

 

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2007). TIMSS 2007 International Science Report. 

Science.

 

Mastaglia,  B.,  Toye,  C.,  &  Krisjanson,  L.  J.  (2003).  Ensuring  content  validity  in 

instrument development: Challenges and innovative approaches.  Contemporary

se, 14(3).

 

Mastaglia,  B.,  Toye,  C.,  &  Kristjanson,  L.  J.  (2003).  Ensuring  content  validity  in 

instrument development: Challenges and innovative approaches.  Contemporary Nurse, 14(June 2015), 

281–291. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.14.3.281

 

Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational 

types inferens in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 1031–1056.

 

Mchugh,  M.  L.  (2012).  Lessons  in  biostatistics  Interrater  reliability?:  the  kappa 

statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.

 

Mercer,  N.,  Dawes,  L.,  Wegerif,  R.,  &  Sams,  C.  (2004).  Reasoning  as  a  scientist: ways  

of  helping children  to  use  language  to  learn  science.  British  Educational Research     

Journal,     30(3),     359–377.     https://doi.org/10.1080/014119204

10001689689

 

Moss,  K.,  &  Crowley,  M.  (2011).  Computers  &  Education  Effective  learning  in science?: 

The use of personal response systems with a wide range of audiences. Computers       &       

Education,       56(1),       36–43.       https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2010.03.021

 

Mueller,  M.  P.,  &  Zeidler,  D.  L.  (2010).  Moral  –  Ethical  Character  and  Science 

Education?:  EcoJustice  Ethics  Through  Socioscientific  Issues  (  SSI  ).  In  D.J Tippins et. 

al. (Ed.), Cultural Studies & Environmentalism (Vol. 3, pp. 105–128).

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90- 481-3929-3

 

Nazirmuddin Ahmad, Mohd Taib Arifin, Marinah Awang. (2005). Pengantar Etika.

Pustaka Salam Sdn. Bhd.

 

Neber, H., & Schommer-Ai,.H. (2010). Self-regulated Science Learning with Highly Gifted  Students?: 

 The  role  of  cognitive  ,  Self-regulated  Science  Learning  with Highly Gifted Students?: the 

role of cognitive , motivational , epistemological ,. High     Ability     Studies,     (March     

2013),     37–41.     https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13598130220132316

 

Noar, S. M. (2009). Structural Equation Modeling?: A The Role of Structural Equation Modeling    in 

   Scale    Development.    Structural    Equation    Modeling:    A Multidisciplinary   Journal,   

10(4)(February   2014),   622–647.   https://doi.org

/10.1207/S15328007SEM1004

 

Nordin, A., & Lin, H. (2011). Hubungan sikap terhadap mata pelajaran sains dengan penguasaan  

konsep  asas  sains  pelajar  tingkatan  dua.  Journal  of  Science  & Mathematics    Education,    

(June),    89–101.    Retrieved    from    http://eprints. utm.my/13431/

 

Nuangchale,  P.  (2009).  Development  of  Socioscientific  Issues-Based  Teaching  for Preservice  

 Science   Teachers.   Journal   of   Social   Sciences,   5(3),   239–243.

https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.239.243

 

Global  Warming

through  Socioscientific

Issues-based Instruction, 6(8), 42–47.

 

Nunnally,  J.  C.,  &  Bernstein,  I.  H.  (1994).  Psychometric  Theory  (3rd  editio).  New York: 

McGraw-Hill.

 

Oecd.  (2011).  Education  at  a  Glance  2011.  OECD  indicators.  Education.  https:// 

doi.org/10.1787/eag-2011-en

 

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (n.d.). International Journal of Science Attitudes towards 

science?: A review of the literature and its implications, (January 2013), 37–41. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

 

Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual - a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for 

windows (version 10). Buckingham Open University Press.

 

Park,  M.,  Kjervik,  D.,  Crandell,  J.,  &  Oermann,  M.  H.  (2012).  The  relationship  of 

ethics  education  to  moral  sensitivity  and  moral  reasoning  skills  of  nursing students.     

 Nursing      Ethics,      19(4),      568–580.      https://doi.org/10.1177

/0969733011433922

 

Pegg,   J.   M.   (2006).   Developing   explanations:   student   reasoning   about   science 

concepts  during  claims-evidence  inquiry  lessons.  Interpreting.  Retrieved  from 

http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/handle/1957/3190

 

Perry,  William  G.,  J.  (1979).  Forms  of  intellectual  and  ethical  development  in  the 

college   years:   A   scheme.   Jossey-Bass   Publishers,   350   Sansome   St.,   San Francisco, 

CA 94104; Tel: 415-433-1767,.

 

Piaget,  J.  (1976).  Piaget  â€TM  s  Theory.  Springer-Verlag  New  York  Inc.  1976. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46323-5_2

 

Polit,  D.  F.,  &  Beck,  C.  T.  (2004).  Nursing  research:  Principles  and  methods  (7th 

edit). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.

 

Ratcliffe,  M.  (1997).  Pupil  decision?making  about  socio?scientific  issues  within  the 

science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167–182. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190203

 

Reips‘,   U.-D.,   &   Frederick,   F.   (2008).   Interval-level   measurement   with   visual 

analogue  scales  in  Internet-based  research?:  V  AS  Generator,  40(3),  699–704. 

https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.699

 

Reis,  P.  (2009).  Teaching  Controversial  Socio-Scientific  Issues  in  Biology  and Geology 

Classes?: A Case Study.  Electronic Journal of  Science Education, 13, 1–24.

 

Reiss, M. J. (2006). Teacher Education and the New Biology Teacher Education and the  New  Biology. 

 Teaching  Education,  (April  2013),  37–41.  https://doi.org/

/10476210600680325

 

Remenyi,  D.,  Williams‘,  B.,  Money,  A.,  &  Swartz,  E.  (1998).  Doing  Reserch  in Business  

and  Management:  An  Introduction  to  process  and  method.   Sage Publication.

 

Repman,  J.,  Zinskie,  C.,  &  Carlson,  R.  D.  (2016).  Effective  Use  of  CMC  Tools  in 

Interactive Online Learning (Vol. 569). https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v22n01

 

Reuker, S. (2016). The knowledge-based reasoning of physical education teachers?: A comparison   

between   groups   with   different   expertise.   European   Physical Educational Review, 1–22. 

https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15624245

 

Rindermann,  H.,  &  Baumeister,  A.  E.  E.  (2014).  Validating  the  Interpretations  of PISA  

and  TIMSS  Tasks:  A  Rating  Study.  International  Journal  of  Testing, 15(1), 1–22. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.966911

 

Robottom,  I.  (2012).  Socio-Scientific  Issues  in  Education:  Innovative  Practices  and 

Contending   Epistemologies.   Research   in   Science   Education,   42,   95–107. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9258-x

 

Ross,  S.  M.,  Morrison,  G.  R.,  &  Lowther,  D.  L.  (2010).  Educational  Technology Research  

Past  and  Present?:  Balancing  Rigor  and  Relevance  to  Impact  School Learning. Contemporary 

Educational Technology, 1(1), 17–35.

 

Roth,  W.,  &  Is,  C.  V.  A.  (1993).  The  Development  of  Science  Process  Skills  in 

Authentic Contexts, 30(2), 127–152.

 

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio- scientific 

 issues.  Journal  of  Moral  Education,  33(3),  339–358.  https://doi.org/ 

10.1080/0305724042000733091

 

Sadler, T. D. (2009a). Situated learning in science education: socio?scientific issues as    

contexts    for    practice.    Studies    in    Science    Education    (Vol.    45). 

https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839

 

Sadler, T. D. (2009b). Situated learning in science education: socio?scientific issues as contexts 

for practice. Studies in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839

 

Sadler, T. D. (2011). A Socio-Scientific Issues in The Classroom?: Teaching, Learning and Learning. 

(Troy D. Sadler, Ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/978- 94-007-1159-4_16.

 

Sadler,  T.  D.  (2011).  Turkish  Preservice  Science  Teachers  ‘  Informal  Reasoning Regarding  

Socioscientific  Issues  and  the  Factors  Influencing  Their  Informal Reasoning, 313–332. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9221-0

 

Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of  the  nature 

 of  science  in  response  to  a  socioscientific  issue.  International Journal    of    Science  

  Education,    26(4),    387–409.    https://doi.org/10.1080/

69032000119456

 

Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. a. (2006). Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content  

knowledge  and  morality.  International  Journal  of  Science  Education, 28(12), 1463–1488. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717

 

Sadler,  T.  D.,  &  Zeidler,  D.  L.  (2004).  The  Morality  of  Socioscientific  Issues: 

Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4–27. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101

 

Sadler,  T.  D.,  &  Zeidler,  D.  L.  (2005a).  The  significance  of  content  knowledge  for 

informal    reasoning    regarding    socioscientific    issues:    Applying    genetics knowledge  

to  genetic  engineering  issues.  Science  Education,  89(1),  71–93. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023

 

Sadler, T. D.,  &  Zeidler, D.  L. (2005b). The significance of  content knowledge for informal    

reasoning    regarding    socioscientific    issues:    Applying    genetics knowledge  to  genetic 

 engineering  issues.  Science  Education,  89(1),  71–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20023

 

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse:  

Assessment  for  progressive  aims  of  science  education.  Journal  of Research in Science 

Teaching, 46(8), 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20327

 

Salomon,  G.,  &  Almog,  T.  (1998).  Educational  Psychology  and  Technology?:  A Matter   of   

Reciprocal   Relations.   Educational   Psychology   and   Technology, 100(1), 222–241.

 

Sampson,  V.,  Simon,  S.,  Amos,  R.,  &  Evagorou,  M.  (2011).  Metalogue:  Engaging Students in 

Scientific and Socio-scientific Argumentation BT   - Socio-scientific Issues  in  The  classroom.  

(pp.  193–200).  https://doi.org/  10.1007/978-94-007- 1159-4

 

Santos,  D.  (2008).  Scientific  Literacy?:  A  Freirean  Perspective  as  a  Radical  View.

Wiley InterScience, (2006), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20301

 

Saunders, K. J., & Rennie, L. J. (2011). A Pedagogical Model for Ethical Inquiry into 

Socioscientific Issues In Science. On Line Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9248-z

 

Saunders,  M.  N.  K.,  Lewis,  P.,  &  Thornhill,  A.  (2012).  Research  Methods  for Business 

Students. (6 edition). London: FT Prentice Hall.

 

Schmidt, C. D., Mcadams, C. R., & Foster, V. (2009). Promoting the moral reasoning of undergraduate 

business students through a deliberate psychological education

?   based  classroom  intervention.  Journal  of  Moral  Education,  38(December 2014), 37–41. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240903101556

 

Schommer-aikins, M., & Easter, M. (2006). Ways of Knowing and Epistemological Beliefs?:  Combined  

effect  on  academic  performance.  Educational  Psychology,

. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500341304

 

Schumacker, & Lomax. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling.

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

 

Sekaran,  U.  (2010).  Research  Methods  For  Business  A  Skill  Building  Approach. Journal   of 

  Education   for   Business   Book   Review,   (March   2015),   1–3. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1993.10117635

 

Sewall Wright. (1934). The Method of Path Coefficients. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 

5(3), 161–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011815.b2a13089

Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate techniques. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Shuell,  T.  J.  

(1986).  Cognitive  Conceptions  of  Learning.  Review  of  Educational

Research, 56(4), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543056004411

 

Siegel, M. A., & Ranney, M. A. (2003). Developing the Changes in Attitude about the Relevance of 

Science ( CARS ) Questionnaire and Assessing Two High School Science Classes, 40(8), 757–775. 

https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10110

 

Siegler, R. S. (2016). Continuity and Change in the Field of Cognitive Development and in the 

Perspectives of One Cognitive Developmentalist. Child Development Perspectives, 0(0), 1–6. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12173

 

Siew Fong Yap. (2014). Beliefs, values, ethics and moral reasoning in socio-scientific education. 

Issues in Educational Research, 24(3), 2014, 24(24(3)), 21. Retrieved from 

http://www.iier.org.au/iier24/yap.pdf

 

Simonneaux, L. (2008). Argumentation in socio-scientific contexts. Argumentation in Science 

Education, 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2

 

Simonneaux,  L.,  &  Simonneaux,  J.  (2009).  Students‘  socio-scientific  reasoning  on 

controversies  from  the  viewpoint  of  education  for  sustainable  development. Cultural  

Studies  of  Science  Education,  4,  657–687.  https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11422-008-9141-x

 

Smith,  C.  L.,  Maclin,  D.,  Houghton,  C.,  &  Hennessey,  M.  G.  (2010).  Sixth-Grade Students 

 â€TM  Epistemologies  of  Science?:  The   Impact  of  School  Science Experiences   on   

Epistemological   Development.   Cognition   and   Instruction, 18(3)(May 2013), 349–422. 

https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1803_3

 

Snyder,   T.   E.,   &   Gamas,   W.   S.   (2014).   Promoting   in   conceptual   change   A 

comparative meta-analysis science?: from interventions of instructional education reading education 

and science, 28(2), 116–159.

 

Sobel, M. E. (1987). from the SAGE Social Science Collections . Rights Reserved . from  All.  

Sociological  Method  &  Research,  volume  16(no.1).  https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0049124187016001006

 

Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An Introduction. Newbury Park?: Sage 

Publication.

 

Stan ey A. Mulaik. (2009).  Linear Causal Modeling with Strctural Equations. CRC

Press.

Subiantoro,   A.   W.   (2011).   Socioscientific   Issues   and   its   Potency   on   Biology 

Instruction for Character Education in Indonesia, (November), 1–6.

 

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2011). Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd editio).

New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.

 

Tal,  R.,  &  Hochberg,  N.  (2003).  Assessing  High  Order  Thinking  of  Students Participating 

in The ?Wise? Project in Israel. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, 69–89. 

https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(03)00016-6

 

Tal,  T.,  Kali,  Y.,  Magid,  S.,  &  Madhok,  J.  J.  (2011).  Socio-scientific  issues  in  the 

Classroom.  Socio-Scientific  Issies  in  the  Classroom:  Teaching,  Learning  and Results, 

39(October), 11–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4

 

Tal, T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: classroom culture and students‘  

performances.  Cultural  Studies  of  Science  Education,  1(4),  615–644. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9026-9

 

Tarhini, R. M. B. Y. O. A. (2016). "A Jordanian empirical study of the associations among 

transformational leadership, transactional leadership, knowledge sharing, job   performance,   and  

 firm   performance:   a   structural   equation   modelling approach. Journal of Management 

Development, 35(5).

 

Thiroux,  J.  P.  (2001).  Ethics,  Theory  &  Practice  (7  edition).  New  Jersey,  Prentice Hall 

Inc.

 

Thompson,  M.,  Bayi,  E.,  &  Boro,  K.  (2015).  Teachers‘  Practices  in  Kindergarden 

Classrooms:Cognitive  Constructivist  Theory  of  Learning.  International  Open Acces Journal, 

1–3.

 

TIMSS       Implications       for       U.S.       Education.       (n.d.).       Retrieved       

from http://christienken.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Tienken_AASA_Winter_ 13_TIMSS.pdf

 

Trompenears,  F.,   &  Hamden-Turner,  C.  (1997).   Riding  The   Wave   of  Culture: 

Understanding  Culteral  Diversity  in  Business  (2nd  editio).  London?:  Nicholas Brealey.

 

Tsai, C. (2010). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions   

of   constructivist   learning   environments.   Educational   Research, (February 2015), 37–41. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800363836

 

Tsai,  M.,  &  Tsai,  C.  (2010).  Innovations  in  Education  and  Teaching  International 

Information  searching  strategies  in  web-based  science  learning?:  the  role  of internet  

self-efficacy  Information  Searching  Strategies  in  Web-Based  Science Learning?:   The   Role   

of   Internet   Self-Efficacy,   (October   2014),   37–41.

rg/10.1080/1355800032000038822

 

Tytler,  R.,  &  Peterson,  S.  (2003).  Tracing  young  children‘s  scientific  reasoning. 

Research  in  Science  Education,  33,  433–465.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE. 

0000005250.04426.67

 

U.  Narmadha,  &  Dr.  S.  Chamundeswari.  (2013).  Attitude  towards  Learning  of Science   and   

Academic   Achievement   in   Science   among   Students   at   the Secondary  Level.  Journal  of  

Sociological  Research  ,  4(2),  114–124.  https:// doi.org/10.5296/jsr.v4i2.3909

 

Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade  10  

students‘  argumentation  skills,  informal  reasoning,  and  conceptual understanding of science. 

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 952–977. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20358

 

Vernon,  D.  T.  A.,  &  Blake,  R.  L.  (1993).  Does  Problem  Based  Learning Work?  A 

Meta-Analysis  of  Evaluative  Research.  Journal  of  The  Association  of  America Medical 

Colleges, 68(7), 550–563.

 

Voss, J. F., Perkins, D. N., & Segal, J. w. (2009). Informal Reasoning and Education.

Routledge New York London.

 

Wheaton,  B.,  Muthen,  B.,  Alwin,  D.  F.,  &  Summers,  G.  F.  (1977).  Assessing reliability 

and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84–136. 

https://doi.org/10.2307/270754

 

Wicks,   A.   C.,   &   Freeman,   R.   E.   (1998).   Organization   Studies   and   the   New 

Pragmatism?:   Positivism   ,   Anti-positivism   ,   and   the   Search   for   Ethics. 

Orhanization Science, 9(2), 123–140.

 

Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). The Effects of Different On-line Searching Activities on   High   

School   Students‘   Cognitive   Structures   and   Informal   Reasoning Regarding a 

Socio-scientific Issue. Research in Science Education, 41, 771–785. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-010-9189-y

 

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd editio). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage 

Publication.

 

Yuan,  K.-H.,  Marshall,  L.  L.,  &  Bentler,  P.  M.  (2002).  A  unified  approach  to 

exploratory  factor  analysis  with  missing  data,  nonnormal  data,  and  in  the presence     of 

    outliers.     Psychometrika,     67(1),     95–121.     https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02294711

 

Yusri, I. M. (2010). Bimbingan Cepat: Analisis Data Penyelidikan Untuk Pendidikan & Sains Sosial. 

Bandar Ilmu, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.

 

Yusuf  al-Qaradawi.  (1994).  The  Lawful&  The  Prohibited  in  Islam?:  Al-Halal  Wal- Haram Fil 

Islam. American Trust Publication.

 

Zabani  Darus.  (2012).  Status  Pencapaian  Malaysia  dalam  TIMSS  dan  PISA?:  Satu

Refleksi. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

 

Zainudin,  A.  (2014).  A  Hand  Book  on  Structural  Equation  Modeling.  MPWS  Rich

Resources, Selangor Malaysia.

 

Zainudin, A. (2015). Research Methology & Data Analysis. UiTM Press.

 

Zanaton,  Lilia,  &  Kamisah.  (2006).  Sikap  Terhadap  Sains  dalam  Kalangan  Pelajar Sains   

eli   Peringkat   Menengah   dan   Matrikulasi.   Pertanika   Journal   Social Science, 14(2).

 

Zeidler,  D.  L.  (2003).  The  Role  of  Moral  Reasoning  on  Socioscientific  Issues  and 

Discourse   in   Science   Education.   Retrieved   from   http://link.springer.com/ 

book/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X

 

Zeidler,  D.  L.,  Florida,  S.,  & Nichols,  B.  H.  (2009).  Socioscientific  Issues?:  Theory 

and Practice, 21(2), 49–58.

 

Zeidler,  D.  L.,  Herman,  B.  C.,  Ruzek,  M.,  Linder,  A.,  &  Lin,  S.-S.  (2013).  Cross- 

cultural   epistemological   orientations   to   socioscientific   issues.   Journal   of Research 

in Science Teaching, 50(3), 251–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21077

 

Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The Role of Moral Reasoning and the Status of Socioscientific  

Issues  in  Science  Education.  The  Role  of  Moral  Reasoning  on Socioscientific Issues and 

Discourse in Science  Education, 7–38 TS–CrossRef. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4996-X_2 M4  - 

Citavi

 

Zeidler,   D.   L.,   &   Sadler,   T.   D.   (2007).   The   Role   of   Moral   Reasoning   in 

Argumentation?: Conscience , Character , and Care. In Argumentation in science education (pp. 

201–216). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_10

 

Zeidler,  D.  L.,  &  Sadler,  T.  D.  (2008).  Social   and  Ethical   Issues  in  Science 

Education?:   A   Prelude   to   Action   1   C.   Science   and   Education,   799–803. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9130-6

 

Zeidler, D.  L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S.,  &  Callahan,  B. E.  (2009).  Advancing reflective  

judgment  through  Socioscientific   Issues.  Journal  of  Research  in Science Teaching, 46(1), 

74–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281

 

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005a). Beyond STS: A   

research-based   framework   for   socioscientific   issues   education.   Science Education, 

89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048

 

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005b). Beyond STS: A   

research-based   framework   for   socioscientific   issues   education.   Science Education, 

89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048

 

Zeidler, M. D., Ph, D., Howes, E., Ph, D., Ferron, J., Ph, D., … Ph, D. (2009). College Students  ? 

 Use  of  Science  Content  During  Socioscientific  Issues  Negotiation?: Impact of Evolution 

Understanding and Acceptance by Samantha R . Fowler A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment 

of the requirements for the degree of

Doctor of P.

 

Zikmund, W. G. (1994). Business Research Methods (4th ed.). Fort Worth: Dryden.

 

Zimmerman,    C.    (2000).    The    Development    of    Scientific    Reasoning    Skills.

Developmental Review, 20, 99–149. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0497

 

Zimmerman,  C.  (2005).  The  Development  of  Scientific  Reasoning  Skills:  What Psychologists 

Contribute to an Understanding of Elementary Science Learning. Final      Report      to      the   

   National      Research      Concil.      https://doi.org/ 10.1006/drev.1999.0497

 

Zimmerman, C. (2007).  The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and   middle   

school.   Developmental   Review,   27,   172–223.   https://doi.org

/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001

 

Zohar,   A.,   &   Nemet,   F.   (2002).   Fostering   Students   â€TM   Knowledge   and 

Argumentation   Skills   Through   Dilemmas   in   Human   Genetics.   Journal   of

Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008